Taxonomy is a scientific discipline that has provided the universal naming and classification system of biodiversity for centuries and continues effectively to accommodate new knowledge. A recent publication by Garnett and Christidis expressed concerns regarding the difficulty that taxonomic changes represent for conservation efforts and proposed the establishment of a system to govern taxonomic changes. Their proposal to “restrict the freedom of taxonomic action” through governing subcommittees that would “review taxonomic papers for compliance” and their assertion that “the scientific community’s failure to govern taxonomy threatens the effectiveness of global efforts to halt biodiversity loss, damages the credibility of science, and is expensive to society” are flawed in many respects. They also assert that the lack of governance of taxonomy damages conservation efforts, harms the credibility of science, and is costly to society. Herein, we contribute to the conversation between taxonomists and conservation biologists aiming to clarify some misunderstandings and issues in the proposition by Garnett and Christidis.
Taxonomy based on science is necessary for global conservation

MORE RESOURCES:
Public Garden Magazine – Volume 40, Issue 1
FOCAL POINTS The Transformative Power of Pay Equity at Filoli Embracing Ecology Principles in Leadership: A Path to Adaptive, Forward-Thinking...
READ MORE
Fundraising for Food and Ag Programs in Public Gardens
Presented by the Food & Agriculture Community Everybody eats! Food and agriculture programming is growing in public gardens across North...
READ MORE
Working Through Programmatic Changes with Volunteers
Presented by the Volunteer Engagement Community We all know that changes are a given, but changes can be hard for...
READ MORE
Ask an Expert: Living Collections & Conservation
Presented by the Emerging Professionals Community Watch this enlightening panel discussion with three leading figures in plant conservation, collections management,...
READ MORE