Inadequate information on the geographical distribution of biodiversity hampers decision-making for conservation. Major efforts are underway to fill knowledge gaps, but there are increasing concerns that publishing the locations of species is dangerous, particularly for species at risk of exploitation. While we recognize that well-informed control of location data for highly sensitive taxa is necessary to avoid risks, such as poaching or habitat disturbance by recreational visitors, we argue that ignoring the benefits of sharing biodiversity data could unnecessarily obstruct conservation efforts for species and locations with low risks of exploitation. We provide a decision tree protocol for scientists that systematically considers both the risks of exploitation and potential benefits of increased conservation activities. Our protocol helps scientists assess the impacts of publishing biodiversity data and aims to enhance conservation opportunities, promote community engagement and reduce duplication of survey efforts.
A decision tree for assessing the risks and benefits of publishing biodiversity data
Presented by Gallagher & Associates & Cheekwood Estate & Gardens Learn how to diversify audiences, increase learning, and encourage ongoing...READ MORE
Extinction rates are expected to increase as we move through the Anthropocene (our current geologic era), yet we have a...READ MORE
Fiscal year 2023 saw many changes for the American Public Gardens Association. The return of in-person events, increased staff turnover,...READ MORE
How do we care for aging and venerable trees? This was the central question for the research project of Hans...READ MORE