The need for integration of ex situ and in situ approaches in conservation of plants has long been recognized. However, ex situ collections have numerous limitations that reduce their utility for conservation, necessitating the introduction of new, more appropriate, flexible and less costly approaches. Two new approaches that can be called “intermediate” between in situ and ex situ, and bridging them in some way have been proposed over the last two decades. In these approaches material collected in natural populations is planted and maintained outside the original location, but with a different purpose. While the purpose of the inter situs approach is reintroduction, the concern of the quasi in situ approach is long-term storage of species genetic diversity. I view these two approaches as complementary and necessary components of conservation-oriented restoration. In restoration of a degraded habitat using threatened species (i.e. inter situs), quasi in situ collections can serve an important role in providing longterm preservation of these species’ genetic diversity and production of seeds needed for restoration.
Complementarities of two existing intermediate conservation approaches
MORE RESOURCES:
BHS October – Cybersecurity Awareness Month
October is Cybersecurity Awareness Month. During this month, the public and private sectors work together to raise awareness about the...
READ MORE September BHS: Preparing for Workplace Emergencies
September is National Preparedness Month, which encourages individuals and organizations alike to prepare for emergency situations, disasters and health risks...
READ MORE Public Garden Magazine – Volume 39, No. 3
FOCAL POINTS RESTORING NATURE’S BALANCE: FORD HOUSE’S SHORELINE RESTORATION PROJECT A FOREST WITHIN A GARDEN: THE LONG-TERM LEGACY OF SUSTAINABLY-MANAGED...
READ MORE Ask an Expert: CEOs
Presented by: The Emerging Professionals Community Leadership in Bloom: Insights from Top Garden CEOs Join us for the "Ask an...
READ MORE